Russia House


Slam dunk journalism or propaganda warfare?

by Edward Lozansky
More Information...
An Open Letter to the British Prime Minister, David Cameron.

The speech of British Prime Minister David Cameron in the newspaper Sunday Times with sweeping accusations against Russia marked a new stage of escalation of the Ukrainian crisis in order to involve EU in the war against Russia.

By S. Stepashin
More Information...
What Is at Stake in Ukraine
A horrible civil warwith global ramifications.

By Andranik Migranyan
More Information...
Piling on Putin

By William Dunkerley
More Information...
Is US bent on bringing down Russia? Some in Kremlin say yes.
Many leading foreign policy advisers to Putin say that Ukraine is merely an excuse for US-led sanctions, and that Washington is bent on 'regime change' in Russia.

By Fred Weir
More Information...
To stop Putin the west should repair Ukraines economy

By Thomas Graham
More Information...
Sanctions and Airliners

by Paul Craig Roberts
More Information...
Ukraine -- Kievs War | The Heroes of Novo Russia

by George Eliason
More Information...
Oil Deals Make Putin Immune to Sanctions.

By Leonid Bershidsky

More Information...
NYT Dishes More Ukraine Propaganda.
The mainstream U.S. media continues to sell the American people a one-sided storyline on the Ukraine crisis as the Kiev regime celebrates a key military victory at Slovyansk, an eastern city at the center of ethnic Russian resistance to last Februarys violent coup that ousted elected President Yanukovych,

By Robert Parry.
More Information...
Russia House


Final notes on Russias elections and what next?

Edward LOZANSKY, President, American University in Moscow

Usually elections in foreign countries do not attract too much public or media attention in the U.S., especially not in the middle of our own presidential campaign. This time it was different, though. Major American newspapers almost daily printed two or even three dispatches from Moscow, most of them featuring devastating criticism of Putin, praise of the opposition (despite communists and outright nazis being part of it) and anticipation of something like an orange revolution or Arab spring fast approaching.

To the great disappointment of many such observers, instead of joining the list of deposed dictators like Gaddafi or Mubarak, Putin won the election with what is generally known as a landslide. Everyone, with the notable exception of Senator McCain, had to admit, often reluctantly, that Putins victory was overwhelming and thus legitimate.

President Obama spent about a week thinking of what to do about it but then, observing that all the other world leaders have already congratulated Putin on his victory, he, too, placed the call, apparently fearing that America might be seen to be a teeny bit out of step with the world it professes to lead.
That was not the most curious reaction to Putins election, though. Not by far. For all their abstruse talk, philosophers sometimes come up with very apt dicta. Like, Extremes meet. Id say this time they met with a resounding clang. Senator McCain and Comrade Zyuganov, leader of the Russian communists, sang in operatic unison: Putins election was fraudulent, a sham, and thus illegitimate.

Well, it is a more or less recognized fact that while McCain is living in a phantasmal world of his own comrade Zyu is a different matter altogether. During the election campaign he repeatedly stated that his goal is to bring Russia back to the Leninist-Stalinist model that is: a one-party political system, a single candidate per ballot, each getting no less than 99.99 percent of the 100 percent turnout.

One wonders why Mikhail Gorbachev should join McCain and Zyuganov, babbling something about the elections illegitimacy. The man who is praised (at least in the West) for saving the world from a nuclear holocaust and who worked shoulder to shoulder with Ronald Reagan in throwing communism to the dustbin of history, could do better than act in this comical fashion.

Really, Gorby should have a more accurate idea of what the term legitimacy means. The only time he went to the electorate in a new Russia, he quite legitimately got all of 1.75 percent, or some such figure. One would have thought that Gorbachev could afford one or two professional advisors who would tutor him ahead of the interviews.

As for U.S. establishment it would be wise for them to take note that despite sometime strong anti-American rhetoric, Putin is willing and able to act pragmatically. His latest words: "If we had managed to achieve a breakthrough on missile defense, this would have opened the floodgates for building a qualitatively new model of cooperation, similar to an alliance" should be considered more seriously before flat rejection, unless, of course, we want to repeat all our mistakes in Russia policy in the last 20 years.