Russia House

editorial

2016-09-30
The First Debate: Advantage, Clinton

By Srdja Trifkovic
More Information...
2016-09-30
Rand Report: Russian Propaganda Significant Threat to the US
Alleged documentation of the 'remarkable evolution' of Russian propaganda

By William Dunkerley
More Information...
2016-09-30
Clintons Faulty New Scheme to Fight ISIS

By Daniel Lazare
More Information...
2016-09-30
Kremlin calls for impartial, full investigation of MH17 crash in Ukraine
More Information...
2016-09-28
The Debate: Trumps Three Points for Peace
Better on nukes, better on entangling alliances, better on Russia

By Justin Raimondo
More Information...
2016-09-28
NATO is reviewing 'nuclear playbook' to deter 'terrible attacks' by Russia - Pentagon chief
More Information...
2016-09-28
Clinton Toned Down Her Hawkishness

By Robert Parry
More Information...
2016-09-27
US Press Would Rather Decry 'Russia Today' Than Render It Irrelevant by Doing Its Job
If there's any reason for the mainstream press to fear RT it's because it's not doing its job

By Adam Johnson
More Information...
2016-09-27
CIA Whistleblower Kiriakou Honored for Integrity

By Ray McGovern
More Information...
2016-09-27
Russian radar data shows no missile attack on MH17 from rebel side, indicates Ukraine involvement
More Information...
Russia House

2012-03-17

Final notes on Russias elections and what next?

Edward LOZANSKY, President, American University in Moscow

Usually elections in foreign countries do not attract too much public or media attention in the U.S., especially not in the middle of our own presidential campaign. This time it was different, though. Major American newspapers almost daily printed two or even three dispatches from Moscow, most of them featuring devastating criticism of Putin, praise of the opposition (despite communists and outright nazis being part of it) and anticipation of something like an orange revolution or Arab spring fast approaching.

To the great disappointment of many such observers, instead of joining the list of deposed dictators like Gaddafi or Mubarak, Putin won the election with what is generally known as a landslide. Everyone, with the notable exception of Senator McCain, had to admit, often reluctantly, that Putins victory was overwhelming and thus legitimate.

President Obama spent about a week thinking of what to do about it but then, observing that all the other world leaders have already congratulated Putin on his victory, he, too, placed the call, apparently fearing that America might be seen to be a teeny bit out of step with the world it professes to lead.
That was not the most curious reaction to Putins election, though. Not by far. For all their abstruse talk, philosophers sometimes come up with very apt dicta. Like, Extremes meet. Id say this time they met with a resounding clang. Senator McCain and Comrade Zyuganov, leader of the Russian communists, sang in operatic unison: Putins election was fraudulent, a sham, and thus illegitimate.

Well, it is a more or less recognized fact that while McCain is living in a phantasmal world of his own comrade Zyu is a different matter altogether. During the election campaign he repeatedly stated that his goal is to bring Russia back to the Leninist-Stalinist model that is: a one-party political system, a single candidate per ballot, each getting no less than 99.99 percent of the 100 percent turnout.

One wonders why Mikhail Gorbachev should join McCain and Zyuganov, babbling something about the elections illegitimacy. The man who is praised (at least in the West) for saving the world from a nuclear holocaust and who worked shoulder to shoulder with Ronald Reagan in throwing communism to the dustbin of history, could do better than act in this comical fashion.

Really, Gorby should have a more accurate idea of what the term legitimacy means. The only time he went to the electorate in a new Russia, he quite legitimately got all of 1.75 percent, or some such figure. One would have thought that Gorbachev could afford one or two professional advisors who would tutor him ahead of the interviews.

As for U.S. establishment it would be wise for them to take note that despite sometime strong anti-American rhetoric, Putin is willing and able to act pragmatically. His latest words: "If we had managed to achieve a breakthrough on missile defense, this would have opened the floodgates for building a qualitatively new model of cooperation, similar to an alliance" should be considered more seriously before flat rejection, unless, of course, we want to repeat all our mistakes in Russia policy in the last 20 years.