Russia House

editorial

2015-09-01
Can South Stream Make a Comeback?
Bulgarians seem to think so - especially with negotiations on Turkish Stream stalled

By Ari Rusila
More Information...
2015-09-01
American, not Russian, aggression is the real problem

By Bryan MacDonald
More Information...
2015-09-01
Assange: What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates

B Julian Assange
More Information...
2015-09-01
US Considering Two Candidates to Replace Poroshenko?
More Information...
2015-08-31
Will IMF Throw Away the Law on Russia's Ukraine Loan?
Kiev incredibly insists Russia's $3 billion loan to Ukraine is commercial rather than official - and has so far not been corrected by the IMF

Meaningful because Ukraine can default on a 'commercial' loan without IMF withdrawing its financing

By James Carden
More Information...
2015-08-31
How Sanctions on Russia Help the Islamic State
Fewer job prospects for Central Asian guest workers leaves the vulnerable to radicalization and recruitment by moneyed Islamic extremists

BY Richard Lourie
More Information...
2015-08-31
DOES RUSSIA HAVE A FUTURE?

By Gilbert Doctorow
More Information...
2015-08-28
The US is Fully Prepared to Fight Putin - to the Last Ukrainian

More Information...
2015-08-28
It's West, Not Russia, That's Blocking Truth on MH17
Western media continous to spout stupidity on MH17. Christopher Black rebuffs it

Russia has shared its data. It's US intelligence agencies and the Dutch-led investigation that won't reveal any of its own

By Christopher Black
More Information...
2015-08-28
Russia Won't Take a Haircut on Its Ukraine Loan as West Wants
And why should it? The west continues to pretend that since private creditors are taking a haircut on their loans so should Russia - but Russia is not a private entity and meanwhile western institutions and states are refusing to take a haircut themselves

A reminder - by the terms of the agreement Russia could have called in the loan a year ago - but opted not to
More Information...
Russia House

2012-03-29

Jackson-Vanik Amendment and the Rights of Indians

Edward LOZANSKY, President, American University in Moscow

The more I watch the goings-on in Washington regarding graduating Russia from the Jackson-Vanik Amendment (JVA), the more it reminds me of the deal struck almost 400 years ago by a certain Peter Minuit. On May 24, 1626, the guy purchased the island of Manhattan from some Native Americans for goods to the value of 60 Dutch guilders, estimated to be the equivalent of $24.

Not that I am against this graduation, even if its become a bit of rigmarole by now. In fact, in April 2011 my good friend Anthony Salvia of the American Institute in Ukraine and I filed a lawsuit against Obama. We demanded that he should graduate Russia from JVA without seeking congressional approval.

According to a careful reading of the statute, the president has constitutional authority to do just that. Significantly, this view is shared by none other than Richard Perle, Senator Henry Jacksons former chief of staff, the man who actually wrote the text of the amendment and who, I should add, is not at all an admirer of Putins Russia.

Nevertheless, Obamas lawyers fought hard to dismiss this lawsuit. Their argument was based on technical rather than substantive grounds. As it happened, Tony and I could prove only our moral but not material injury from JVA. More importantly, though, the administration basically admitted that, in strict legal terms, we as plaintiffs were absolutely right.

While three administrations have successively claimed the need for congressional action to graduate Russia from JVA trade restrictions, it is highly indicative of the soundness of our case that the Department of Justice did not make that claim in its brief to the court! They know that under the law as it is written, permanent removal of trade restrictions does not require any congressional sanction.

As things stand now, the big irony is that with Russias accession to the WTO, the amendment, which was supposed to rightly punish the Soviet Union, will now be damaging to U.S. business interests.

Proof? The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, along with 173 U.S. companies, including such giants as General Electric, Deere, Boeing, Ford, GM and Chrysler, sent letters to Congress demanding the normalization of trade with Russia by lifting JVA. One wonders why they did that. Have they suddenly switched from business to charity or human rights activities? Doubtfully, very doubtfully indeed.

The reason is obvious: plenty of U.S. companies are eager to see this JVA graduation because it directly serves their interests. For Russia this is just a moral issue, while for America, its more a matter of dollars and cents. If the republicans are stupid enough to kill this graduation Id like to see their faces when they meet U.S. business lobbyists the morning after.

Realistically speaking, the amendment is sure to be lifted, and sooner rather than later. But when Congress eventually does what it is supposed to have done 20 years ago, after the collapse of communism and the Soviet Union, this will most likely be hyped as a great big gift to Russia, very much like Minuits offer of $24 to the Indians.

Thats not the end of the story, though. To show Congress that he was not too soft on Putin, Obama declared the establishment of a new $50 million fund to support Russian non-governmental organizations that are committed to a more pluralistic and open society.

In view of Russias concern over American meddling in its internal affairs, it is hard to imagine a more dubious move. In fact, even some potential Russian grant recipients have been soured by this idea. Surely, in these difficult economic times, U.S. taxpayers might certainly find better ways to spend these democracy promotion funds on the domestic front just ask any resident of the towns and counties across America that are now close to bankruptcy.