Russia House

editorial

2017-05-19
When the Trump Coup-makers Cometh

By Robert Parry
More Information...
2017-05-19
Dimwitted and dangerous

By Paul Robinson
More Information...
2017-05-19
RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 18 MAY 2017

BY PATRICK ARMSTRONG
More Information...
2017-05-18
Trumped-up claims against Trump

By Ray McGovern
More Information...
2017-05-18
Obama Holdovers Successfully Sabotaging Trump's War Against ISIS

By George Rasley
More Information...
2017-05-18

More Information...
2017-05-16
Trumps Need for Scapegoats

By Paul R. Pillar
More Information...
2017-05-16
Lavrov-Trump meeting focused on Syria de-escalation zones
More Information...
2017-05-16
Lavrov at the White House

by BINOY KAMPMARK
More Information...
2017-05-15
Shut Down the 'Russia-gate' Farce
It's bogus, it's boring, and it's hurting the country

By Justin Raimondo
More Information...
Russia House

2017-04-18

Report: Trump's National Security Advisor Wants to Send 50,000 US Troops to Syria
Just days ago Trump said US was 'not going into Syria'

By Jason Ditz

Throughout the first couple of months of the Trump Administration, everyone seemed to be relatively on the same page with public comments about their plans for changes to the various US wars, and the answer was pretty much exclusively to send more troops and conduct more strikes everywhere.

This was true of Syria too, but the actual scope of the escalation could be far bigger than anyone expected, with reports circulating that National Security Adviser HR McMaster is pushing a massive escalation with a deployment of up to 50,000 US ground troops to the country.

When President Trump took office, Syria had only about 300-400 US troops present, and while that number has grown significantly (exact figures are no longer provided by the Pentagon), a 50,000 troop deployment would be both shocking and have a huge impact on the region, likely sparking a major backlash from Syria, who has not invited US troops to operate in their territory in the first place.

Either way, the Trump Administrations leadership seems to be quite divided on the question of troops for Syria, with many said to be resisting any massive changes in favor of smaller, more manageable escalations.
This is in keeping with what the US commander in Iraq and Syria said only yesterday, and with President Trumps recent assurance that the US isnt going into Syria, because while the US is already very much in Syria, it would be absurd for Trump to offer such an assurance and then send 50,000 troops shortly thereafter.

"Antiwar.com"