Russia House

editorial

2017-07-28
RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 27 JULY 2017

BY PATRICK ARMSTRONG
More Information...
2017-07-28
RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 13 JULY 2017

BY PATRICK ARMSTRONG
More Information...
2017-07-28
Was Trump Wrong to End the CIA's Train-and-Equip Program in Syria?
Why the rush to condemn Trump's only smart decision since taking office?

By James Carden
More Information...
2017-07-28
Europe Fears Russia Sanctions Upgrade, But Will Go Along With Washington Anyway

By Kenneth Rapoza
More Information...
2017-07-26
Macrons Maneuvers on the New Cold War

By Dennis J Bernstein
More Information...
2017-07-26
Sensational Report: Is Russiagate a Hoax Ordered by Vladimir Putin?
The Russians may have developed the capability to create elaborate hoaxes that turn the US into a laughing stock in the eyes of outsiders

By Russell O'Phobe

More Information...
2017-07-26
Are America's Wars Just and Moral?

By Patrick J. Buchanan
More Information...
2017-07-25
White House Signals Growing Acceptance of New Russia Sanctions Bill
His Press Secretary says Trump "supports where the legislation is now"

By Jason Ditz
More Information...
2017-07-25
Pitching the Forever War in Afghanistan

By James W Carden
More Information...
2017-07-25
OPEC, non-OPEC oil output cuts compliance nears 100% - Russian energy minister
More Information...
Russia House

2017-04-18

Report: Trump's National Security Advisor Wants to Send 50,000 US Troops to Syria
Just days ago Trump said US was 'not going into Syria'

By Jason Ditz

Throughout the first couple of months of the Trump Administration, everyone seemed to be relatively on the same page with public comments about their plans for changes to the various US wars, and the answer was pretty much exclusively to send more troops and conduct more strikes everywhere.

This was true of Syria too, but the actual scope of the escalation could be far bigger than anyone expected, with reports circulating that National Security Adviser HR McMaster is pushing a massive escalation with a deployment of up to 50,000 US ground troops to the country.

When President Trump took office, Syria had only about 300-400 US troops present, and while that number has grown significantly (exact figures are no longer provided by the Pentagon), a 50,000 troop deployment would be both shocking and have a huge impact on the region, likely sparking a major backlash from Syria, who has not invited US troops to operate in their territory in the first place.

Either way, the Trump Administrations leadership seems to be quite divided on the question of troops for Syria, with many said to be resisting any massive changes in favor of smaller, more manageable escalations.
This is in keeping with what the US commander in Iraq and Syria said only yesterday, and with President Trumps recent assurance that the US isnt going into Syria, because while the US is already very much in Syria, it would be absurd for Trump to offer such an assurance and then send 50,000 troops shortly thereafter.

"Antiwar.com"